Langnostik is a parsing platform for transforming jargon-heavy documents into clear, structured language for humans and AI.
Langnostik reveals what experts see by enriching documents with deterministic parsing — instantly and without training, hallucination, or guesswork.
Note how complex wording becomes clearer when enriched
Notice what changes, and how it adds meaning.
LIP parses domain-specific phrasing, acronyms, and compound terms into a normalized, structured form. Think of it as revealing the “full shape” of the language you’re already using.
Standard Input
The desk reviewed exposure across FX, rates, and credit following volatility in the repo market and widening spreads in IG and HY. Front office noted that BOA and JPM were both active in block trades tied to MBS and CMO flows, while back office flagged delays in STP due to mismatches in DTCC settlement instructions.
During the morning call, traders referenced LIBOR transition impacts on swaps and swaptions booked earlier in the quarter, particularly where legacy contracts referenced LIBOR rather than SOFR. Risk mgmt raised concerns around VAR spikes driven by correlated moves in USTs and CDS, especially in portfolios with heavy exposure to EM debt.
The mid-off escalated reconciliation breaks involving trades executed OTC via ECNs and cleared through CME, noting discrepancies between confirmations from GS, MS, and CSFB. Several positions were rolled using short-term repo while treasury assessed liquidity needs ahead of upcoming auctions.
Meanwhile, compliance flagged potential issues related to SEC reporting thresholds after a series of cross-venue executions spanning NYSE, NASDAQ, and dark pools. Operations noted that BONY and DTCC cutoffs would require same-day resolution to avoid fails.
In parallel, the structured products team evaluated CDO tranches linked to underlying RMBS collateral, factoring in prepayment assumptions and duration risk. Analysts cited Moody’s commentary on credit deterioration and revised outlooks for select issuers.
By end of day, management requested a consolidated view of exposure by asset class, counterparty, and clearing venue, emphasizing the need for improved STP and clearer alignment between front office intent and back office execution.
Enriched Output
The desk reviewed exposure across Foreign Exchange (FX), interest rates, and credit following volatility in the repurchase agreement (repo) market and widening spreads in Investment Grade (IG) and High Yield (HY). Front office noted that Bank of America (BOA) and JPMorgan Chase (JPM) were both active in block trades tied to Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS) and Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMO) flows, while back office flagged delays in Straight Through Processing (STP) due to mismatches in Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) settlement instructions.
During the morning call, traders referenced London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) transition impacts on interest rate swaps (swaps) and swap options (swaptions) booked earlier in the quarter, particularly where legacy contracts referenced London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) rather than Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR). Risk management (Risk mgmt) raised concerns around Value at Risk (VaR) spikes driven by correlated moves in U.S. Treasuries (USTs) and Credit Default Swaps (CDS), especially in portfolios with heavy exposure to Emerging Market (EM) debt.
The middle office (mid-off) escalated reconciliation breaks involving trades executed Over the Counter (OTC) via Electronic Communication Networks (ECNs) and cleared through the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), noting discrepancies between confirmations from Goldman Sachs (GS), Morgan Stanley (MS), and Credit Suisse First Boston (CSFB). Several positions were rolled using short-term repurchase agreements (repo) while treasury assessed liquidity needs ahead of upcoming auctions.
Meanwhile, compliance flagged potential issues related to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reporting thresholds after a series of cross-venue executions spanning the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), NASDAQ, and dark pools. Operations noted that Bank of New York Mellon (BONY) and Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) cutoffs would require same-day resolution to avoid fails.
In parallel, the structured products team evaluated Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) tranches linked to underlying Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS) collateral, factoring in prepayment assumptions and duration risk. Analysts cited Moody’s Investors Service (Moody's) commentary on credit deterioration and revised outlooks for select issuers.
By end of day, management requested a consolidated view of exposure by asset class, counterparty, and clearing venue, emphasizing the need for improved Straight Through Processing (STP) and clearer alignment between front office intent and back office execution.
Standard Input
The patient was admitted through the ED at NYU following complaints of SOB and chest pain. Initial labs and ECG were ordered, and the attending noted a possible NSTEMI pending cTn results. The patient’s PMH includes HTN, DM, and prior admission at MSMC.
Care coordination flagged that the patient is covered under a PPO administered by UHG, requiring prior auth for imaging beyond standard protocols. CM contacted the payer to confirm coverage and benefits, while utilization review monitored LOS against benchmarks.
During rounds, clinicians discussed discharge planning contingent on stable vitals and negative follow-up labs. Orders were entered into the EHR, and nursing staff documented progress notes accordingly. The care team referenced prior imaging performed at MassGen to avoid duplicate testing.
Billing later identified coding considerations related to ICD-10 and CPT alignment, noting potential DRG impact. Compliance reviewed the chart for documentation sufficiency prior to claim submission. By end of day, administration requested a summary of patient flow, payer mix, and outstanding authorizations across inpatient units.
Enriched Output
The patient was admitted through the Emergency Department (ED) at NYU Langone Medical Center (NYU) following complaints of Shortness of Breath (SOB) and chest pain. Initial labs and Electrocardiogram (ECG) were ordered, and the attending noted a possible Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) pending Cardiac Troponin Test (cTn) results. The patient’s Past Medical History (PMH) includes Hypertension (HTN), Diabetes Mellitus (DM), and prior admission at Mount Sinai Medical Center (MSMC).
Care coordination flagged that the patient is covered under a Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) administered by UnitedHealth Group (UHG), requiring prior authorization (prior auth) for imaging beyond standard protocols. Case managementm (CM) contacted the payer to confirm coverage and benefits, while utilization review monitored Length of Stay (LOS) against benchmarks.
During rounds, clinicians discussed discharge planning contingent on stable vitals and negative follow-up labs. Orders were entered into the Electronic Health Record (EHR), and nursing staff documented progress notes accordingly. The care team referenced prior imaging performed at Massachusetts General Hospital (MassGen) to avoid duplicate testing.
Billing later identified coding considerations related to International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) alignment, noting potential Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) impact. Compliance reviewed the chart for documentation sufficiency prior to claim submission. By end of day, administration requested a summary of patient flow, payer mix, and outstanding authorizations across inpatient units.
Standard Input
FNOL was received for an auto loss with alleged BI exposure, and the claim was set up under the insured’s P&C policy. The adjuster requested the dec page and loss runs and noted potential coverage questions based on exclusions and the reported facts.
The claimant’s counsel submitted a demand package referencing UM/UIM, and the file was escalated for SIU review due to indicators flagged in the intake. The estimate was prepared using ACV assumptions, while the insured requested an RCV settlement and asked whether OEM parts would be authorized.
The carrier issued an ROR pending additional investigation and confirmed subro potential against a third party. Payments were documented as indemnity vs ALE, and reserves were updated to reflect severity.
By end of week, management requested a summary of open exposures, reserve adequacy, and any pending litigation or coverage determinations.
Enriched Output
First Notice of Loss (FNOL) was received for an auto loss with alleged Bodily Injury (BI) exposure, and the claim was set up under the insured’s Property and Casualty (P&C) policy. The adjuster requested the declarations page (dec page) and claims history report (loss runs) and noted potential coverage questions based on exclusions and the reported facts.
The claimant’s counsel submitted a demand package referencing Uninsured Motorist / Underinsured Motorist (UM/UIM), and the file was escalated for Special Investigations Unit (SIU) review due to indicators flagged in the intake. The estimate was prepared using Actual Cash Value (ACV) assumptions, while the insured requested a Replacement Cost Value (RCV) settlement and asked whether Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) parts would be authorized.
The carrier issued a Reservation of Rights (ROR) pending additional investigation and confirmed subrogation (subro) potential against a third party. Payments were documented as indemnity (claim payment for covered loss) vs Additional Living Expense (ALE), and reserves were updated to reflect severity.
By end of week, management requested a summary of open exposures, reserve adequacy, and any pending litigation or coverage determinations.
Standard Input
The audit team completed interim testing and requested additional PBC items related to revenue recognition and internal controls. Management noted no material changes since the prior period, though SOX testing identified control deficiencies requiring remediation.
During the review, questions were raised regarding GAAP treatment for deferred revenue and the classification of certain non-GAAP adjustments in GL. The controller coordinated with PwC to assess potential impacts on the financial statements.
Tax advisors reviewed DTAs and valuation allowances, while the engagement team evaluated the risk of material misstatement. Draft footnotes were updated ahead of the filing deadline, and the audit opinion remained subject to final partner review.
By quarter end, leadership requested a summary of audit status, outstanding findings, and readiness for external reporting.
Enriched Output
The audit team completed interim testing and requested additional Provided by Client (PBC) items related to revenue recognition and internal controls. Management noted no material changes since the prior period, though Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) testing identified control deficiencies requiring remediation.
During the review, questions were raised regarding Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) treatment for deferred revenue and the classification of certain unusual occurrence (non-GAAP) adjustments in the General Ledger (GL). The controller coordinated with PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) to assess potential impacts on the financial statements.
Tax advisors reviewed deferred tax assets (DTAs) and valuation allowances, while the engagement team evaluated the risk of material misstatement. Draft footnotes were updated ahead of the filing deadline, and the audit opinion remained subject to final partner review.
By quarter end, leadership requested a summary of audit status, outstanding findings, and readiness for external reporting.
Standard Input
The crew reported intermittent faults on the APU during preflight, and maintenance deferred corrective action per the MEL. During taxi, ATC issued revised instructions due to traffic flow constraints, and the aircraft was held short pending clearance from GC.
After departure, the flight climbed to FL350 and engaged the autopilot, while ACARS messages were exchanged with the AOCC regarding updated routing. Weather advisories included moderate CAT along the planned airway, requiring minor altitude adjustments coordinated with ATC.
En route, flight ops monitored fuel burn against plan, noting variance due to headwinds. The crew referenced the QRH following a caution message related to the air data system, though parameters stabilized without further action.
On approach, the aircraft was vectored for an ILS, with ATIS indicating reduced visibility and a low ceiling. The landing was completed without incident, and post-flight reports were submitted for engineering review.
Enriched Output
The crew reported intermittent faults on the Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) during preflight, and maintenance deferred corrective action per the Minimum Equipment List (MEL). During taxi, Air Traffic Control (ATC) issued revised instructions due to traffic flow constraints, and the aircraft was held short pending clearance from ground control.
After departure, the flight climbed to Flight Level 350 (FL350) and engaged the autopilot, while Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) messages were exchanged with the Airline Operations Control Center (AOCC) regarding updated routing. Weather advisories included moderate Clear Air Turbulence (CAT) along the planned airway, requiring minor altitude adjustments coordinated with ATC.
En route, flight operations monitored fuel burn against plan, noting variance due to headwinds. The crew referenced the Quick Reference Handbook (QRH) following a caution message related to the air data system, though parameters stabilized without further action.
On approach, the aircraft was vectored for an Instrument Landing System (ILS), with Automatic Terminal Information Service (ATIS) indicating reduced visibility and a low ceiling. The landing was completed without incident, and post-flight reports were submitted for engineering review.
Standard Input
The study advanced into P2I following positive P1 safety results, with the sponsor coordinating activities across CRO partners and clinical sites. Enrollment criteria were updated per protocol amendments, and data capture continued through the EDC system.
Interim analysis focused on PK and PD endpoints, while safety monitoring reviewed reported AEs and SAEs. The DSMB convened to assess emerging trends prior to expanding cohort size. Manufacturing teams flagged potential CMC considerations related to scale-up timelines.
RA noted upcoming FDA interactions, including a pre-IND meeting to align on trial design and endpoints. Parallel work continued on companion diagnostics to support patient stratification.
By end of quarter, management requested consolidated reporting across pipelines, partners, and indications to support portfolio review and investment planning.
Enriched Output
The study advanced into Phase II following positive Phase I safety results, with the sponsor coordinating activities across Contract Research Organization (CRO) partners and clinical sites. Enrollment criteria were updated per protocol amendments, and data capture continued through the Electronic Data Capture (EDC) system.
Interim analysis focused on Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) endpoints, while safety monitoring reviewed reported Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). The Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) convened to assess emerging trends prior to expanding cohort size. Manufacturing teams flagged potential Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) considerations related to scale-up timelines.
Regulatory affairs (RA) noted upcoming Food and Drug Administration (FDA) interactions, including a pre-Investigational New Drug (pre-IND) meeting to align on trial design and endpoints. Parallel work continued on companion diagnostics to support patient stratification.
By end of quarter, management requested consolidated reporting across pipelines, partners, and indications to support portfolio review and investment planning.
Result will appear here…
Now that you've seen it, here’s what’s happening
When subject matter experts read technical or specialized writing, much of the structure is implicit: shorthand, acronyms, domain-specific phrasing, and conventions that don’t need to be spelled out.
Other readers — and AI systems — don’t have access to that implicit structure.
Language-Independent Parsing (LIP) helps make that structure explicit, not by interpreting meaning, but by applying deterministic, expert-defined rules. Domain specialists define and continuously enhance libraries that normalize how terms, phrases, and compound expressions are used in their field — including conventions, common typos, variants, and context-dependent constructions.
The examples above are intentionally simple. In practice, LIP resolves overlapping phrases, stabilizes sub-phrases before higher-order expressions, and normalizes text through cascading rules — producing clearer, readable output while preserving the original wording exactly as written.
It’s rule-driven. It’s predictable. And it behaves the same way every time you run it.
Garbage in → hallucinations out
Ambiguous or overloaded text creates confusion — for people and for AI models.
LIP gives both a clearer starting point. And once the input is cleaner, everything downstream becomes easier
See how LIP libraries work
When you're ready, go deeper here.